<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RUTROW.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rutrow.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rutrow.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Corporations Are People, Too by The end is near&#8230; &#171; RUTROW.org</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2008/05/19/corporations-are-people-too/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>The end is near&#8230; &#171; RUTROW.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/2008/05/19/corporations-are-people-too/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>[...] http://rutrow.org/2008/05/19/corporations-are-people-too/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://rutrow.org/2008/05/19/corporations-are-people-too/" rel="nofollow">http://rutrow.org/2008/05/19/corporations-are-people-too/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Am I not important or what!? by Anil 1314</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2009/09/25/am-i-not-important-or-what/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil 1314</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=217#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I saw they just added Diane Garnick to the list of speakers at Buttonwood too.  This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to meet these kind of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw they just added Diane Garnick to the list of speakers at Buttonwood too.  This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to meet these kind of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Benjamin Franklin, Communist by Environmentalist Green is the New Commie Red - Page 2 - INGunOwners</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2009/09/13/benjamin-franklin-communist/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Environmentalist Green is the New Commie Red - Page 2 - INGunOwners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=146#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] commie activities...  Breaking: Glenn Beck NOT a communist  And Dear God...Benjamin Franklin...  Benjamin Franklin, Communist RUTROW.org  I guess you were correct...there is a commie behind every tree.  WTF ever... Carry on comrades.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] commie activities&#8230;  Breaking: Glenn Beck NOT a communist  And Dear God&#8230;Benjamin Franklin&#8230;  Benjamin Franklin, Communist RUTROW.org  I guess you were correct&#8230;there is a commie behind every tree.  WTF ever&#8230; Carry on comrades.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservative &#8220;jokes&#8221; by Brian of Florida</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2009/08/06/conservative-jokes/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian of Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=96#comment-84</guid>
		<description>PBO (President Barrak Obama) and his hacks bussed protesters to AIG Executives homes, and yes they were advocating violence against the Exec and his family terrifying them.  When In Kentucky the same organizers who shouted about Baby Killers at the front gates in 1978 were demanding that the soldiers help protect their homes from floodwaters when the Ohio flood stage hit 26 feet March 1997.  Yes I ran into a protester from 1978.  Yes I went on my time off and filed sandbags.
Having been in the military I have gone from being spit on while in uniform in atlanta airport 1978 to being called a terrorist.  I notice that Liberals in general are not willing to defend themselves, side with people trying to Kill me, and disparage the military.
Yet they want protection from those they put down and prosecute.  Want to take guns away from legal law abiding people so that only criminals have them.
the Blackwater fiasco was a group protecting coward politicians who would not stand up and tell the truth.
They came back to the safety of the US and denounced investigate and prosecuted them.
So if everyone becomes a liberal, who will fight the bad guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PBO (President Barrak Obama) and his hacks bussed protesters to AIG Executives homes, and yes they were advocating violence against the Exec and his family terrifying them.  When In Kentucky the same organizers who shouted about Baby Killers at the front gates in 1978 were demanding that the soldiers help protect their homes from floodwaters when the Ohio flood stage hit 26 feet March 1997.  Yes I ran into a protester from 1978.  Yes I went on my time off and filed sandbags.<br />
Having been in the military I have gone from being spit on while in uniform in atlanta airport 1978 to being called a terrorist.  I notice that Liberals in general are not willing to defend themselves, side with people trying to Kill me, and disparage the military.<br />
Yet they want protection from those they put down and prosecute.  Want to take guns away from legal law abiding people so that only criminals have them.<br />
the Blackwater fiasco was a group protecting coward politicians who would not stand up and tell the truth.<br />
They came back to the safety of the US and denounced investigate and prosecuted them.<br />
So if everyone becomes a liberal, who will fight the bad guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The China Syndrome&#8230; by Healthcare and Communism&#8230; &#171; RUTROW.org</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2009/07/29/the-china-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare and Communism&#8230; &#171; RUTROW.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=32#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] If you really want to worry about Communism (capital C), then why don&#8217;t you go after one of our preferential trading partners China? Oh wait, they opened up to capitalism so now they&#8217;re our best friends!  August 5th, 2009 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you really want to worry about Communism (capital C), then why don&#8217;t you go after one of our preferential trading partners China? Oh wait, they opened up to capitalism so now they&#8217;re our best friends!  August 5th, 2009 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time To Go &#8220;Sextuple&#8221; Meta on Health Care by scathew</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2009/08/01/time-to-go-sextuple-meta-on-health-care-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>scathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=51#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Well, I am humbled to be in the membership of such a sextuple (er, maybe I should rephrase that?)!

In respect, I have added you to my &quot;blogroll&quot; (links)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am humbled to be in the membership of such a sextuple (er, maybe I should rephrase that?)!</p>
<p>In respect, I have added you to my &#8220;blogroll&#8221; (links)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time To Go &#8220;Sextuple&#8221; Meta on Health Care by Robert Waldmann</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2009/08/01/time-to-go-sextuple-meta-on-health-care-2/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Waldmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=51#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I really never imagined it would reach sextuple.  Congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really never imagined it would reach sextuple.  Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Slump of 1930 by Albert Singh</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2008/11/26/the-great-slump-of-1930/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=29#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Two aspects of this essay by Keynes seem highly relevant today.

I. Keynes stressed the threat which the slump posed to ‘the social stability of every country alike’. 

‘… a series of bankruptcies, defaults, and repudiations which would shake the capitalist order to its foundations … would be a fertile soil for agitation, seditions, and revolution. It is so already in many quarters of the world.’

The only place where I know this aspect of this essay of Keynes and his other writings has been discussed is in Donald Markwell’s book called ‘Economic Paths to War and Peace - John Maynard Keynes and International Relations’ (around pages 172-173). 

II. Keynes ended by stressing the necessity of the monetary authorities of the big economic powers acting together.

‘…nor can any one central bank do enough acting in isolation. … the most effectibe remedy would be that the central banks of these three great creditor nations [the United States, France, and England] should join together in a bold scheme to restore confidence to the international long-term loan market; which would serve to revive enterprise and activity everywhere, and to restore prices and profits, so that in due course the wheels of the world’s commerce would go round again.’

As Markwell’s book also shows, this necessity of international economic action is one of the key lessons from Keynes’s thinking, at least from the aftermath of the First World War on.

Does anybody else think these two points from Keynes are of the utmost importance to our current global meltdown?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two aspects of this essay by Keynes seem highly relevant today.</p>
<p>I. Keynes stressed the threat which the slump posed to ‘the social stability of every country alike’. </p>
<p>‘… a series of bankruptcies, defaults, and repudiations which would shake the capitalist order to its foundations … would be a fertile soil for agitation, seditions, and revolution. It is so already in many quarters of the world.’</p>
<p>The only place where I know this aspect of this essay of Keynes and his other writings has been discussed is in Donald Markwell’s book called ‘Economic Paths to War and Peace &#8211; John Maynard Keynes and International Relations’ (around pages 172-173). </p>
<p>II. Keynes ended by stressing the necessity of the monetary authorities of the big economic powers acting together.</p>
<p>‘…nor can any one central bank do enough acting in isolation. … the most effectibe remedy would be that the central banks of these three great creditor nations [the United States, France, and England] should join together in a bold scheme to restore confidence to the international long-term loan market; which would serve to revive enterprise and activity everywhere, and to restore prices and profits, so that in due course the wheels of the world’s commerce would go round again.’</p>
<p>As Markwell’s book also shows, this necessity of international economic action is one of the key lessons from Keynes’s thinking, at least from the aftermath of the First World War on.</p>
<p>Does anybody else think these two points from Keynes are of the utmost importance to our current global meltdown?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe I should cut the Republicans a break&#8230; by scathew</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2008/06/16/maybe-i-should-cut-the-republicans-a-break/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>scathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/?p=22#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Of course, there is always this &quot;gem&quot; (Willie Horton):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC9j6Wfdq3o&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, there is always this &#8220;gem&#8221; (Willie Horton):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC9j6Wfdq3o&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC9j6Wfdq3o&#038;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Military-Industrial Complex by scathew</title>
		<link>http://rutrow.org/2008/05/19/military-industrial-complex/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>scathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rutrow.org/2008/05/19/military-industrial-complex/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Of course, it must be remembered, that it was also President Eisenhower who instituted the executive security and classification framework that exists today and has done more to further the hawkish tendencies than perhaps any other act in recent history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it must be remembered, that it was also President Eisenhower who instituted the executive security and classification framework that exists today and has done more to further the hawkish tendencies than perhaps any other act in recent history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
